dianec42: Joshua tree against a blue sky (South Park 2)
[personal profile] dianec42
Comic strips being outsourced... I knew Doonesbury hasn't been drawn by Trudeau for quite a while; Shoe isn't done by the original guy any more; and now it turns out Rose Is Rose is now "Created by Pat Brady; By Don Wimmer"?!

Who the heck is Don Wimmer? Will this depressing outsourcing craze never end? Are these things just franchises or brands now, to be carried on regardless, even after the original creator decides to stop doing them for whatever reason?

Ugh. Just when I thought the world couldn't get any more soulless. I don't know why, but I'm just finding this oddly creepy.

Date: 2006-03-08 05:00 pm (UTC)
ceo: (Default)
From: [personal profile] ceo
An ex-coworker who's a graphic designer was drawing Boondocks for a while, and the author apparently completely screwed her over (I don't know the details).

from Doonesbury.com FAQs

Date: 2006-03-08 05:30 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
Q: I've heard that GBT no longer draws Doonesbury. True?

A: False. The strip is currently being produced the same way it has been for over 35 years. Trudeau writes the strip alone, and then does tight pencil drawings. The drawings are then either shipped or faxed to his assistant Don Carlton, who traces over Trudeau's finished drawings in ink. The rumor that Trudeau no longer draws the strip was started by Entertainment Weekly. When the magazine subsequently learned that the writer of the piece had wildly exaggerated Carlton's role, it printed a retraction and apology. By then, of course, the damage to Trudeau's reputation had been done, proving once again that a lie does indeed circle the globe before the truth can get its pants on. The irony of the episode was that after years of being blamed for the artwork in Doonesbury, Trudeau suddenly found himself unable to get credit for it.
From: [identity profile] marmota.livejournal.com
Are these things just franchises or brands now, to be carried on regardless [...]?

Unless the artist is good as gold and stupid as mud, yes. Breathed and Watterson metaphorically left a considerable pile of money on the table for their decisions to end their strips. Disney *could* have transitioned to a different corporate logo/identity decades ago, but continues to fight tooth and nail to keep Mickey Mouse out of the public domain, and continues to rake in cash they otherwise would have let go because of it. Scott Adams for example has unabashedly gone for whatever makes the most money of his creation.

Now, that said, I'm all for art for art's sake. In fact, I vastly prefer ephemeral expressions of art since those can only be exploited as directly experienced when they happened. It also always irritates me when an artist gets more focus than their art; they are a messenger for a muse, and I really don't care about the messenger, I just want the message.

In an ideal world, art would be free and artists would get by on their day jobs. However, we're soaking in a capitalist nightmare, not an ideal world.
From: [identity profile] dianec42.livejournal.com
In an ideal world, art would be free and artists would get by on their day jobs. However, we're soaking in a capitalist nightmare, not an ideal world.

I don't know. I think in my ideal world, artists could make a living doing what they're good at -- art would BE their day job. (That's assuming anyone needs a "day job" in said ideal world.)

Of course, I've worked in a place where artists can do that... and video games development companies are NOTHING LIKE an ideal world. Hmmm.

Date: 2006-03-08 08:06 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] querldox.livejournal.com
Shoe does have a good reason for being done by other than creator Jeff MacNelly; he died a few years back.

Date: 2006-03-08 08:57 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] asimovberlioz.livejournal.com
His successors have done a good job keeping up his style, IMAO.

Date: 2006-03-08 09:04 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dianec42.livejournal.com
I think I read somewhere that Pat Brady is actually male. Can't remember where I read that though.

I did not know that about MacNelly! Now I'm sad.

Date: 2006-03-08 11:51 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dianec42.livejournal.com
Please ignore my previous comment, I read "Shoe" as "She".

Profile

dianec42: Joshua tree against a blue sky (Default)
dianec42

May 2025

S M T W T F S
    123
45678910
11121314151617
18 192021222324
25262728293031

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated May. 28th, 2025 10:15 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios