ext_120524 ([identity profile] dianec42.livejournal.com) wrote in [personal profile] dianec42 2006-06-09 08:34 pm (UTC)

I note with some amusement that the Wikipedia article solemnly refers to both "Reports of symptoms and health conditions in the media" and "Self-reported cases on the Internet" as major sources of the controversy.

Having said that, the stuff is definitely addictive and definitely messes with MY head (don't know about anybody else's). There's really no conceivable benefit to my consuming it, unless it's attached to the only available caffeine source. (-:

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
(will be screened if not on Access List)
(will be screened if not on Access List)
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting